Part III · The Trade
Chapter 09 · 14 min read

The Human Renaissance

Every powerful tool humiliates one layer of human labor while revealing a deeper one.

The machine age did not end the value of the human hand.

Industrial machinery did not make craftsmanship meaningless. It made cheap repetition abundant and transformed craftsmanship into something more specific, more intentional, more valuable where quality mattered. Photography did not eliminate painting. It forced painting to discover what only painting could do. Calculators did not end mathematics. They moved the value away from arithmetic and toward abstraction, modeling, interpretation, and proof.

Every powerful tool humiliates one layer of human labor while revealing a deeper one.

Every powerful tool humiliates one layer of human labor while revealing a deeper one.

Artificial intelligence is doing the same thing to cognition.

The first shock of generative AI was humiliation. The machine could write. The machine could code. The machine could summarize. The machine could imitate a lawyer, a teacher, a marketer, a designer, a consultant, a poet, a strategist, a therapist, a programmer, a researcher, and a friend. It could produce in seconds what humans had been paid to produce over hours or days.

For many people, the conclusion seemed obvious: human cognitive labor was being devalued.

The surface layer was being commoditized.

[ References ]
  1. [01]
    Brynjolfsson & McAfee — “The Second Machine Age, W. W. Norton (2014) · wwnorton.com/books/the-second-machine-age
  2. [02]
    Acemoglu & Restrepo — “Tasks, Automation, and the Rise in U.S. Wage Inequality, Econometrica (2022) · economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Tasks,%20Automation,%20and%20the%20Rise%20in%20U.S.%20Wage%20Inequality.pdf
  3. [03]
    Autor, D. — “Why Are There Still So Many Jobs?, Journal of Economic Perspectives (2015) · www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.29.3.3